|
|
Post by Big Brother (Christian) on Jan 27, 2009 19:23:30 GMT -4
In honor of the recent cast releasments, I believe it is time we settle this once and for all.
my vote is for TAR. You get to see parts of the world never even HEARD of, you see the growth of people's relationships, and has won EVERY SINGLE EMMY for best Reality Competition show, even it's worst seasons and episodes wins.
TAR FTW!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Sister (Softball) on Jan 27, 2009 20:12:19 GMT -4
I think that survivor is a better show than tar. I may think this because I have only watched 3 full seasons of Tar instead of all the seasons of survivor.
|
|
|
|
Post by mvonneumann (Linden Ashbey) on Jan 28, 2009 7:26:33 GMT -4
TAR ftw
its way more suspenseful and the cast is usually more relateable, however given the choice to partake in either the amazing race or survivor, I would play survivor, what they don't show in TAR is how long flying from New Delhi to New York actually takes
(4 spelling mistakes)
|
|
|
|
Post by Crazy James on Jan 28, 2009 7:52:22 GMT -4
I say Survivor ALL THE WAY!
A bigger cast and a wider range of contestant "styles" really goes to show how good the show is.
Plus, you know, Probst is a MUCH better host. He has to memorize what he says where Keoghan uses a teleprompter (I've seen behind the scenes footage showing this).
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Brother (Christian) on Jan 28, 2009 13:23:32 GMT -4
NOOOOOOOOOOO
Phil>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>than Probst. Reason for Teleprompter:
Phil does more sooner, he has to RACE the contestants to each place.
Phil is NEVER an asshole. Probst has been many times. The only time Phil was mean was to Romber then they drove past brian and greg in TAR7, and they deserved it.
There is no wide range of "styles" about 80% of the contestants are young, 20 somethings white people. TAR has a biggeer cast, its smallest being 22, Survivors biggest cast is 20.
|
|
|
|
Post by mvonneumann (Linden Ashbey) on Jan 28, 2009 16:40:19 GMT -4
Phil goes through more then probst, and while probst is a good host, he really seems like a douche bag in real life, Phil seems more down to earth, and as for smaller cast, 11 teams of 2 is 22 people,
survivor is usually 16 people
and softball, I was going for the record
(combined a double post)(also no e in Jeff's name)
|
|
|
|
Post by ! Chad ! on Jan 28, 2009 21:08:44 GMT -4
Survivor Pwns TAR in Ratings each year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Brother (Christian) on Jan 28, 2009 21:17:46 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Sister (Softball) on Jan 28, 2009 21:25:18 GMT -4
However, who knows how accurate the ratings on wikipedia even are. Anyone is able to edit them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Brother (Christian) on Jan 28, 2009 21:32:22 GMT -4
ugh. do you REALLY wanna make me go look?
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Sister (Softball) on Jan 28, 2009 21:41:12 GMT -4
No, but ratings do not mean a whole lot. There are many variables like what shows each are up against and if football games go later and some people have to go to bed and they miss Tar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Brother (Christian) on Jan 28, 2009 21:54:10 GMT -4
thats what i was saying lol
|
|
|
|
Post by mvonneumann (Linden Ashbey) on Jan 29, 2009 3:07:36 GMT -4
ohhh and ummmmm yeah one more thing I forgot to mention, its kinda important
Amazing race is better, phew glad thats settled then
|
|
|
|
Post by Crazy James on Jan 29, 2009 12:16:40 GMT -4
Thats why TAR was switched to a mid-season show at one point (AKA, almost canceled due to poor ratings) |
|
|
|
Post by Big Brother (Christian) on Jan 29, 2009 21:13:11 GMT -4
Yeah, that was like TAR 4, TAR 5 saved it cause it was and still is one of the best seasons.
TAR 12 came in mid season to REPLACE a show that got cancelled. Seasons go September-November is Fall, Feburary-May is Spring, June-August is summer.
TAR 12 was orginallly supposed to be in feb of last year, but was bumbed up do to another show being cancelled.
Besides, TAR contestants much more memorable than Survivor contestants.
|
|
